Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Home
From: Susan Kniep, President

From:  Susan Kniep,  President
The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations, Inc. (FCTO)

Website:  http://ctact.org/
email:  fctopresident@aol.com

860-524-6501

February 13, 2007

 

 

 

Welcome to Tax Talk 96

 

 

 

 

State Legislative Calendar

 

 

 

 

http://www.cga.ct.gov/default.asp?NewDate=1/1/2007February, 2007 http://www.cga.ct.gov/default.asp?NewDate=3/1/2007

S

M

T

W

T

F

S

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the following website daily for

 

 

Legislative Information

 

 

http://www.cga.ct.gov/

 

 

Click here to find your legislator

 

http://www.cga.ct.gov/maps/Townlist.asp

 

***************

Public Health Committee

 

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

 

10:30 AM in Room 1D of the LOB

 

Important Message from FCTO President, Susan Kniep:  Drug maker Merck is bankrolling efforts to have all young girls in this country vaccinated with a drug which The American College of Pediatricians has taken a position against. This Bill is coming up in Connecticut’s State Legislature on February 14 as well as legislatures throughout the country.   Read the following which I have issued to the initial sponsor of the Connecticut Bill who is also the Treasurer of a nonprofit being bankrolled by Merck.  My primary question to the sponsor of the Bill and Merck is-  can you guarantee that the HPV vaccine will have no impact upon a woman’s reproductive system now or in the future?     Should this drug impact reproductive systems in any way the ultimate effect could be catastrophic on us as a nation once all young women in the country are forced to be vaccinated.

 

 

To:  Debra Lee Hovey
Connecticut State
Representative

Room 4200

Hartford, CT 06106

Capitol: 860-240-8700

DebraLee.Hovey@housegop.ct.gov

 

From:  Susan Kniep,  President
The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations, Inc. (FCTO)

Website:  http://ctact.org/
email:  fctopresident@aol.com

860-524-6501

January 28, 2007

 

Subject:  HPV Vaccine, Merck, Women in Government

 

 

The following was recently announced by the Fox News Network:

AUSTIN, Texas —  Merck & Co. is helping bankroll efforts to pass state laws requiring girls as young as 11 or 12 to receive the drugmaker's new vaccine against the sexually transmitted cervical-cancer virus. 

With at least 18 states debating whether to require Merck's Gardasil vaccine for schoolgirls, Merck has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,248781,00.html

A visit to the website for Women in Government lists you as its Treasurer.  http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/board_main.asp

A visit to the State of Connecticut website lists you as the initial sponsor of a Bill which “would require all girls in the state of Connecticut to receive an HPV vaccine about age 12.”   One news source quotes you as follows: Hovey's proposal would make the cervical cancer vaccination a requirement for all girls in the state.

A public hearing is scheduled by the State Legislature on February 14 on a similar bill; i.e. Bill 6977.

 

Your organization, Women in Government, is financially supported by those affiliated with the pharmaceutical industry, to include Merck.  http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp

 

Merck stands to earn billions of dollars per year from the sale of Gardasil if the legislation you initially proposed is approved by the Connecticut State Legislature making the cervical cancer vaccination a requirement for all girls in the state. 

 

As such, I am asking you, as a State Legislator  and  the Treasurer of Women in Government to immediately disclose all money Women in Government has received from the pharmaceutical industry and their affiliates, and most importantly, Merck.   I ask that the information I have requested be clearly delineated by dollar amount per donor. 

 

I suggest that your proposal to the legislature was in direct conflict with your affiliation with Women in Government who are being financed by Merck to promote Merck’s agenda. 

 

Further, The American College of Pediatricians has issued a bold statement citing the need for further study. http://acpeds.org/?CONTEXT=art&cat=12&art=95&BISKIT=3971992680

 

The efforts on the part of Merck to force their agenda before State legislators through your nonprofit, Women in Government, are understandable in their quest to grow their business and realize billions of dollars in profits.  What some are having difficulty in understanding is why the rights of millions of Americans and their female children are being placed at risk based on speculation. 

 

Drug recalls are the norm.  Regrettably, these recalls are due to the illness or death of those who have taken the drug prior to recall. 

As an example, Merck & Co.’s arthritis drug Vioxx was ultimately pulled from the market when it was reported that it may have led to more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths.    Lawsuits against Merck alleged that Merck misled patients about the safety of  Vioxx.       

Another example is Biogen Idec Inc. and Elan Corp. which pulled the multiple-sclerosis treatment Tysabri from the market, following the death of a patient who developed a rare and deadly nervous-system disorder.  It was reported that “Both companies suffered huge declines in share price — wiping out about $17 billion in combined market value.”  

Some play the money game in the stock market when pharmaceutical companies take risks.  Some companies and investors win, others lose. 

The young women in this country should not be used a pawn in this game.  The risks are too great. 

Yet, your organization, Women in Government,  is promoting a drug based on speculation which, if mandated by legislatures throughout this country, could put all young women as they approach their child bearing years at risk. 

My question to you and to Merck, is what assurance can you give American families that the HPV vaccine will not impact the reproductive systems of American women now or in the future.   Can you guarantee there will be no impact?  

We only need to look to the drug Thalidomide which was ultimately pulled from the market after babies were born with severe birth defects. 

Turning your attention to your own State of Connecticut legislative website, I would reflect upon your words ….  

Listening to our fellow citizens and responding to their concerns with common sense solutions to protect individual freedoms and provide a better quality of life for all of Connecticut.

I would ask if you might agree with me that your legislation regarding the HPV vaccine does not “protect individual freedoms” of choice.  Further, the legislation proposed cannot guarantee that it will “provide a better quality of life” for young women who are approaching child bearing age. 

I ask that you reflect upon the following questions.  If you can answer them in the affirmative, I request substantiating documentation from you:

·         Has the HPV vaccine been proven 100% safe for all young women who could be forced by Connecticut’s state legislature to take the HPV vaccine?

·         Can you guarantee that the HPV vaccine will not have any side affects which could be detrimental to all or some young women who could be forced by Connecticut’s state legislature to take the HPV vaccine?

·         Can you guarantee that the HPV vaccine will not be pulled from the market place due to negative health effects discovered after all young women approaching child bearing age have been forced to take the vaccine?  

·         And most importantly, can you guarantee that the HPV vaccine will have no impact upon a woman’s reproductive system now or in the future?  Naturally, you can understand the concern for this question based on the fact that Merck is lobbying legislatures throughout the country in an attempt to have all young women approaching child bearing age vaccinated.  Should this drug impact reproductive systems in any way the ultimate effect could be catastrophic on us as a nation.  

If you cannot answer a resounding YES to the aforementioned and provide the necessary documentation to substantiate your response, I ask that you review the concerns of The American College of Pediatricians and take the initiative to remove legislation based on your proposals from Connecticut’s legislative agenda.   

American families affected by your actions are:

·         Entitled to full disclose of donations/contributions/gifts given to the nonprofit Women in Government of which you are the Treasurer.

·         Entitled to know that State legislators throughout this country are working, not for Merck, but for the public which elected them to office.

·         Entitled to make informed decisions based on expanded trials and resultant data relating to the HPV vaccine and not on the dictates of Connecticut’s state legislature.

 I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Susan Kniep

 

 

Connecticut Bill 6977

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/TOB/h/pdf/2007HB-06977-R00-HB.pdf

Before being permitted to enter sixth grade, a child shall receive an initial dose of human papilloma virus vaccine consistent with the most recent recommendations of the National Immunization Practices Advisory Committee.

 

Merck Pushing HPV Vaccine in Legislatures throughout the Country

http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/HPVvaccine.htm#hpvlegis

 

Many adverse side effects have already been reported http://www.909shot.com/Diseases/HPV/HPVrpt.htm

 

GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE

http://www.inciid.org/article.php?cat=cancer&id=433

 

The American College of Pediatricians has taken a position against this immunization. http://acpeds.org/?CONTEXT=art&cat=12&art=95&BISKIT=3971992680

 

 

*******************

 

 

PREVAILING WAGE IS A

 

A PRIMARY DRIVER OF INCREASED PROPERTY TAXES

 

LEGISLATIVE INFORMATIONAL HEARING

 

THURSDAY, FEB 15, 2007, 9:30 AM, ROOM 2E

 

MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF TAX DOLLARS SPENT FOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING PROJECTS ARE  DRIVEN BY STATE PRVAILING WAGE LAWS

 

WANT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAXES?!?!?

 

WORK TO  REFORM PREVAILING WAGE LAWS!!!!!!!!!

 

ATTEND THE FEBRUARY 15 MEETING!!!!!!!

 

 


Here is a Message from Mike Guarco, BudgetGuru06035 on the Prevailing Wage Hearing :  The informational hearing on prevailing wage reform is next Thursday - Feb 15th - at 930AM in Room 2E in the LOB. It is important to get people to attend................and getting there early is wise. You can bet the unions will look to fill the room...........and to be credible.............we need people there to counterbalance Mike

 

***************